Got questions about opnMe®?
Discover all you need to know about opnMe®! Explore our comprehensive FAQ section, where you can find answers, support, and explore specific topics by using our filters.
Discover all you need to know about opnMe®! Explore our comprehensive FAQ section, where you can find answers, support, and explore specific topics by using our filters.
Ordering a molecule on opnMe is easy; just watch the below video.
Yes, all molecules that can be ordered on opnMe.com (Molecules to order) will be shipped free of charge. This means we cover the costs of synthesis and shipping up to your bench. For shipments outside of Europe, we have to provide a pro-forma value for our molecules to meet international customs regulations. The value of 2,16 €/mg is declared for customs purpose only. Please note that local custom fees may apply and we advise you to check with your local authorities. In case of questions, please contact us for further information.
All our compounds available on opnMe.com are soluble in pure DMSO @ 10mM, and can be stored in solution for several months @ -4°C to -20°C. This solution can be used for your dilutions in your different assays. Please, keep in mind that the remaining quantity of DMSO in your assays depends on the dilution scheme you have used! For storage you can refrigerate our molecules as a solid stock @ 4°C for months without any risk of degradation.
The 2-or-3 letters code refer to the salt that was used to purify our molecules as part of the last step of their synthesis. It means that you will read on the vial a molecular weight slightly different from the one you can find on opnMe.com. In order to understand which exact salt has been used, please refer to the salt code on the molecule vial and the table below. The table provides you also with the information regarding how much the salt changes the molecular weight.
Salt | Salt | Description | Molecular Weight g/mol or Da |
BS | Free Base | No salt defined The molecule is a base | - |
XX | No salt defined | No salt defined | - |
CL2 | Dihydrochloride | Salt formed with two hydrochloric acid molecules | 72.9 |
LML | L-Malate | Salt formed with L-Malic acid or (S)-Hydroxybutanedioic acid | 134.0 |
MU | N-Methyl-D-glucamine | Salt formed with N-Methyl-D-glucamine (Meglumine) | 195.2 |
NA | Sodium | Sodium salt | 22.9 |
PH | Phosphate | Salt with phosphoric acid | 97.9 |
TF | Trifluoracetic acid | Salt with trifluoracetic acid | 114.0 |
SE | acid | No salt defined; indicates acid character of the molecule | - |
FO | Formiate | Salt with Formic acid | 46.0 |
These tool compounds are highly characterized with respect to potency, selectivity and pharmacokinetics. They are suitable for in vivo preclinical studies and guidelines are available to advise on species previously tested, dose selection, dose regimen and formulation.
No. We aim to make unique tool compounds available at a very early stage as the biology is evolving; hence, the compounds will not have been subject to a comprehensive safety evaluation. They are provided as experimental tools for in vitro and in vivo studies and should be treated appropriately according to the practices within your institute.
Negative controls are compounds that we suggest including in experimental setups to ensure that the observed effects are specific to the test compound. They are designed to produce no biological activity in the assay, providing a baseline for comparison and helping to validate the results of your experiments. Many molecules offered on opnMe also come with negative controls to help researchers validate their studies effectively. You can simply choose to include them while ordering your molecules of interest.
No, not all molecules are CNS (central nervous system) penetrant. The ability of a molecule to penetrate the CNS depends on its physicochemical properties, such as lipophilicity or number of H-bond donors or acceptors, as well as its interaction with active transporters at the Blood-Brain-Barrier e.g. PGPs. Specific details and all associated data can be found in the individual molecule profile documents.
Most of our compounds qualified for in vivo studies are dissolved in water solution with Natrosol™ 250 HX PHARM (Hydroxyethyl-cellulose - CAS-Number 9004-62-0).
Please find the process for compound formulation in the pdf document
Selectivity data are essential for understanding how specifically a compound interacts with its intended target versus off targets, helping researchers develop safer and more effective drugs. At opnMe, we provide over 90 well-characterized molecules free of charge, each supported by comprehensive data packages, including the SafetyScreen44™ panel from Eurofins Discovery or kinase panels from Discovery X or Invitrogen. We now also offer selectivity data from PDSP screen for a subset of molecules. You can access all selectivity data here.
We now provide additional selectivity data using the PRESTO-TANGO selectivity screen provided by the Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) for all molecules that Boehringer has donated to the chemical probes program of SGC, further enhancing their utility for research purposes. The PDSP provides data on the binding and activity of chemical compounds across various molecular targets, such as receptors and transporters.
The Structural Genomics Consortium (SGC) is a global, not-for-profit organization that advances drug discovery through open-access research, focusing on "undrugged" proteins and developing chemical probes to explore protein functions and disease mechanisms. The Donated Chemical Probes Program (DCP), led by the SGC and its partners, provides rigorously validated chemical probes to the global research community for free, enabling the study of poorly characterized proteins. Boehringer Ingelheim has generously donated molecules to SGC, which can be ordered for free on opnMe.com or through the DCP platform.
There is no obligation to share the data; however, we would always welcome the chance to view interesting and novel scientific findings.
When you plan a publication, please use the following acknowledgement:
BI-XXXX was kindly provided by Boehringer Ingelheim via its open innovation platform opnMe, available at https://opnme.com.
You can always remove a Molecule for order from the molecule cart by clicking DELETE to the right of each compound. You can also delete the full list of Molecules for order in your cart by clicking on CANCEL.
opnMe® is built on three collaborative pillars: Molecules for collaboration, opn2EXPERTS for molecular biology or pharmacology questions and techMATCH for technology partnerships. With all our collaborative opportunities, our goal is expand our scientific network with experts from across the world that provide novel and relevant angles to contemporary research questions.
We welcome proposals from scientists around the world with very different backgrounds from either academia, startups, biotechs, or even larger enterprises such as device or pharmaceutical companies. We expect you to have access to a laboratory setting for carrying out the studies you propose in your submission and the ability to implement those ideas. We can also only accept proposals if they are provided using our respective submission templates.
You can expect appropriate funding for the collaboration period, should your proposal become selected by our review team. The funding would cover direct and indirect costs, and should be within the range that is defined for each individual call. Usually, you should expect funding for a maximum period of two years. Please refer to the specific calls’ sections for guidance on the exact funding amounts and other benefits offered.
For techMATCH calls, winning proposals can expect appropriate funding that will help them to bring their conceptual idea to the next level whereby we assume that increasing complexity and maturity of the proposed solution may require different budget terms that would be negotiated with the selected partners individually.
Mutually agreeable partner rights & obligations (including intellectual property rights) will be negotiated in our collaboration agreements and provide full transparency on IP ownership. As part of the agreement, you will be encouraged to publish following the collaboration agreement (to be negotiated in good faith).
We highly recommend using our answer submission template to provide a 3-4-page non-confidential proposal plus potential references. The document consists of a “general” part that requires the contact details of the submitting scientist(s) and their organization(s). In addition, an “answer part” which allows the structured entry of your suggested approach to address our question.
While evaluating each proposal, our scientific review committees consider how it aligns with the in-scope/out-of-scope criteria and key success criteria outlined in detail for each call on opnMe, including:
We release these compounds for specific projects to test novel therapeutic hypotheses. The proposals are evaluated by Boehringer Ingelheim scientists and the selected ideas are normally pursued through a joint collaboration. Initial proposals should be short and address the following areas to allow rapid evaluation of your ideas. The submitted proposal must not contain any confidential data.
A template provided by us will help you to compile the information required.
If confidential data exists that would strengthen the proposal, you may indicate that confidential information is available to share under a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA). If we find the non‐confidential concept proposal sufficiently interesting, we will execute a CDA for confidential discussions.
Funding is potentially available to kick-start projects. Research proposals are evaluated by Boehringer Ingelheim scientists for strategic fit and are considered for funding on a competitive basis.
Boehringer Ingelheim scientists with relevant expertise will make an initial evaluation of your collaboration proposal within 4 weeks. Should there be mutual interest in proceeding with the compound request, you will usually be contacted by a Boehringer Ingelheim scientist to discuss the research plan in more detail and to understand how we can best support your idea. The timeframe for collaboration start will be different for each collaboration.
Yes, all molecules that can be ordered on opnMe.com (Molecules to order) will be shipped free of charge. This means we cover the costs of synthesis and shipping up to your bench. For shipments outside of Europe, we have to provide a pro-forma value for our molecules to meet international customs regulations. The value of 2,16 €/mg is declared for customs purpose only. Please note that local custom fees may apply and we advise you to check with your local authorities. In case of questions, please contact us for further information.
Sufficient compound will be provided to test the new therapeutic concept as outlined in the agreed research plan.
The IP rights will be pre-negotiated as part of the contracting arrangements between Boehringer Ingelheim and your institution.
These molecules are also released with a comprehensive data package describing potency on designated target, selectivity information versus other targets and pharmacokinetic characterization. In the first instance, these structures are not released. This allows us to make unique compounds from ongoing projects available to the community much earlier than has previously been possible.
These tool compounds highly characterized with respect to potency, selectivity and pharmacokinetics. They are suitable for in vivo preclinical studies and guidelines are available to advise on species previously tested, dose selection, dose regimen, and formulation.
No. We aim to make unique tool compounds available at a very early stage as the biology is evolving; hence, the compounds will not have been subject to a comprehensive safety evaluation. They are provided as experimental tools for in vitro and in vivo studies and should be treated appropriately according to the practices within your institute.
If you would like to modify and re-upload your proposal, the easiest way would be to start a new submission process and submit your updated proposal that way. Please let us know of the initial proposal ID that you would like to retract, so we can delete it accordingly from our system and only consider your updated proposal for the evaluation process.
Our aim is to find scientists with a novel idea to address our questions. We offer funding for collaboration with the winning scientists of our call.
All incoming answers are evaluated by Boehringer Ingelheim scientists and the selected ideas are normally pursued through a joint collaboration. Initial answers should be short and address the following areas to allow rapid evaluation of your ideas. The submitted proposal must not contain any confidential data. The following information is highly encouraged
A template provided by us will help you to compile the information required.
We are seeking research collaboration proposals that contain:
If confidential data exists that would strengthen the proposal, you may indicate that confidential information is available to share under a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA). If we find the non-confidential concept proposal sufficiently interesting, we will execute a CDA for confidential discussions.
You can expect appropriate funding for the collaboration period should your proposal become selected by our review team. The maximum budget for funding or partnership details are outlined in each call specifically.
Boehringer Ingelheim scientists with relevant expertise will provide you with an evaluation of your collaboration proposal within 6 weeks after the submission deadline of the individual question. Should there be mutual interest in proceeding with the proposed answer, you would be contacted by a Boehringer Ingelheim scientist to discuss the research plan in more detail and to understand how we can best support your idea. The timeframe for the start of a collaboration may be different for each collaboration.
No. Applications will be shared inside Boehringer Ingelheim amongst a team of scientists designated to evaluate proposals for potential funding. They will not be visible to, or shared with, scientists from other institutions.
Our collaboration agreement will provide full transparency about each partner’s rights & obligations (including intellectual property rights). As part of the agreement, you will be encouraged to publish following the collaboration agreement (to be negotiated in good faith).
If you would like to modify and re-upload your proposal, the easiest way would be to start a new submission process and submit your updated proposal that way. Please let us know of the initial proposal ID that you would like to retract, so we can delete it accordingly from our system and only consider your updated proposal for the evaluation process.
The Boehringer Ingelheim ChemKit is a curated collection of high-quality, structurally diverse chemical building blocks designed to accelerate innovation in synthetic chemistry. The ChemKit provides open access to these building blocks for researchers aiming to develop and validate novel synthetic methodologies, especially those relevant to drug discovery and development. Each recipient will receive 500 mg of each building block in the kit, supplied as a powder in individual vials.
To request access, submit a proposal via the opnMe ChemKit collaboration page through December 10, 2025, 11:59 pm PST. Download and complete the submission template, describing your research objectives and requirements. Proposals will be reviewed after the submission deadline, and selected applicants will be notified. Shipments are anticipated to begin in Q2/2026.
Yes, Boehringer Ingelheim covers all compound, shipping, and import costs. However, some countries may require recipients to pay a small customs fee.
The ChemKit is provided as a fixed collection of building blocks.
No. The ChemKit building blocks are strictly for synthetic chemistry research and may not be used for any biological or in vivo experiments.
No additional funding is provided. The ChemKit is supplied free of charge, but no financial support for experiments is included.
There is no obligation to share your research data. However, Boehringer Ingelheim welcomes the opportunity to learn about novel scientific findings. If you publish results, please acknowledge the ChemKit as provided by Boehringer Ingelheim’s open innovation platform, available at https://opnme.com.
All results and any IP rights arising directly from your use of the ChemKit will remain with you.
Our aim is to find scientists with a novel idea to address our questions. We offer funding for collaboration with the winning scientists of our call.
All incoming answers are evaluated by Boehringer Ingelheim scientists and the selected ideas are normally pursued through a joint collaboration. Initial answers should be short and address the following areas to allow rapid evaluation of your ideas. The submitted proposal must not contain any confidential data. The following information is highly encouraged
A template provided by us will help you to compile the information required.
We are seeking research collaboration proposals that contain:
If confidential data exists that would strengthen the proposal, you may indicate that confidential information is available to share under a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA). If we find the non-confidential concept proposal sufficiently interesting, we will execute a CDA for confidential discussions.
You can expect funding of up to USD 80,000 if your submitted proposal has been selected as the winner by our internal review team (including all direct, indirect, overhead costs). Upon completion of the project, the actual costs of the project will be reconciliated versus estimated expenses and any unused funds should be returned to us. In the event the actual expenses are greater than the estimated expenses in the project budget, we will not be liable to pay the difference between the actual expenses and the estimated expenses.
Boehringer Ingelheim scientists with relevant expertise will provide you with an evaluation of your collaboration proposal within 6 weeks after the submission deadline of the individual question. Should there be mutual interest in proceeding with the proposed answer, you would be contacted by a Boehringer Ingelheim scientist to discuss the research plan in more detail and to understand how we can best support your idea. The timeframe for the start of a collaboration may be different for each collaboration.
No. Applications will be shared inside Boehringer Ingelheim amongst a team of scientists designated to evaluate proposals for potential funding. They will not be visible to, or shared with, scientists from other institutions.
All results and all IP therein generated by the researcher will be jointly owned by the researcher´s institute and Boehringer Ingelheim. Each party may freely use the results, without further obligations to the other party. At the same time, we suggest that the parties agree that in order to contribute to the advancement of science for the benefit of the public and to allow the scientific community and industry to use any results following joint publication, they will abstain from pursuing exclusive intellectual property protection with respect to any results. In particular, neither party shall file for a patent right pertaining to any results anywhere in the world and in any field.
If you would like to modify and re-upload your proposal, the easiest way would be to start a new submission process and submit your updated proposal that way. Please let us know of the initial proposal ID that you would like to retract, so we can delete it accordingly from our system and only consider your updated proposal for the evaluation process.
With techMATCH on opnMe, we invite solutions with a focus on technology to propel drug discovery and development forward. We unite your brilliance with our expertise through focused calls on engineering and technology as part of this program. We welcome game-changing ideas from academia, startups, biotech, and larger corporations. Winners will benefit from a long-term, collaborative partnership, that provides open access to our expertise and the prospect of research funding. For biological or pharmacological topics, please consult our opn2EXPERTS program.
We welcome proposals from scientists around the world with very different backgrounds from either academia, startups, biotechs, or even larger enterprises such as device or pharmaceutical companies. As part of these calls, we invite you as an expert to propose concepts that clearly go beyond currently available as well as emerging solutions and envision a breakthrough.
Your proposed idea should cover at least a conceptional outline or prototype that you plan to move forward towards clinical readiness.
We highly recommend using our answer submission template to provide a short non-confidential proposal plus potential references. The document consists of a “general” part that requires the contact details of the submitting scientists and their organizations. In addition, an “answer part” which allows the structured entry of your suggested approach to address our question.
Submissions must only contain non-confidential data and should ideally be short, addressing the following areas to allow rapid evaluation of your idea:
A template provided by us will help you to compile the information required.
If confidential data exists that would strengthen the proposal, you may indicate that confidential information is available to share under a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA). If we find the non-confidential concept proposal sufficiently interesting, we will execute a CDA for confidential discussions.
Winning proposals should expect appropriate funding that will help them to bring their conceptual idea to the next level whereby we assume that increasing complexity and maturity of the proposed solution may require different budget terms that would be negotiated with the selected partners in good faith.
Our scientific jury that comprises of technology experts of Boehringer Ingelheim will provide you with an evaluation of your collaboration proposal after the review process is completed approximately six to eight weeks after the final submission date as outlined on our individual calls. Should there be mutual interest in proceeding with the proposed answer, you would be contacted by us to discuss your proposal in more detail and to understand how we can best support your idea.
No. Applications will be shared inside Boehringer Ingelheim amongst a team of scientists designated to evaluate proposals for potential partnerships. They will not be visible to, or shared with, scientists from other institutions.
Mutually agreeable partner rights & obligations (including intellectual property rights) will be negotiated in our collaboration agreement and provide full transparency. As part of the agreement, you will be encouraged to publish following the collaboration agreement (to be negotiated in good faith).
opnMINER is a convenient way for research scientists to search heterogonous data sources to find and analyze articles, patents, databases or web pages with semantic, ontology based concepts rather than just words. Moreover, it allows you to identify relationships between proteins, chemical compounds, organisms or pharmacological effects or other life science properties.
Thus, opnMINER can help you to answer typical questions arising in pharmacological research:
“Basic Search” retrieves documents that contain the search concepts or terms. While you type in the search field our auto-complete functions check if the text matches any terms or parts of terms in our knowledge domains. A domain term matches if one of its word parts starts with your text or if it matches it completely. Terms in the auto-complete suggestion list are ranked by their prevalence. For example, if you type “sensiti” the suggestion list will include matches such as sensitivity, pressure-sensitive adhesives and sensitive skin but not insensitive or desensitization:
If a search term is part of our knowledge domains we will search the document collections for its occurrence including all of its synonyms and child concepts. Example: If you search for “steroids” the result documents will include matches of steroids but also pregnenolone, testosterone, cholesterol etc. because we know that all of those are steroids.
Otherwise, if the term is not known in our domains, we will search documents for an exact match of the given term. Using * as a wild card in the search term allows expanding the query term, e.g. “a*gonist” searches both for agonist as well as antagonist.
Semantic searching allows, different to simple text based searching, also to search for concepts and sub-concepts. Available documents have been indexed with 10 ontologies from different knowledge domains: chemistry, companies, diseases, drugs, effects, methods, proteins, species, polymers, and toxicology. Thus, if entered search term matches a concept in one of those knowledge domains, the respective domain will be shown in the autocomplete list in parenthesis after the term: e.g. entering “bovine” will show “bovine (Species)” as the first proposed term. This concept can be selected by clicking on it. A subsequent search will yield documents as hits that contain e.g. “cow” or “cattle” - as these are all synonyms of the concept in our species ontology. As a consequence, using the search term “cattle” will yield the same document hits as the search term “bovine”. Another example is the knowledge domain “companies”. Please search for “pharmaceutical companies” to narrow down your search on companies of relevance in the life science sector. Similarly, search for “disease” instead of “indication”. After a while you will understand the strength of the applied approach and be able to adopt your searches accordingly.
High level concepts are especially useful when searching for conceptual relations. Using a high level concept such as for example “cancer (Disease)” as search term will return all documents that include any term representing any disease. Together with a second concept term, e.g. “drugs (Drug)”, in a co-occurrence search (see “What are co-occurrences?”) shows you drugs of interest for the treatment of cancer.
Please see that some terms may occur in multiple ontologies representing a specific semantic meaning. For example “Vitamin D” occurs in the domains of chemistry, drugs and substance. In each of those ontologies, the “Vitamin D” concept has different synonyms and sub-concepts and will thus retrieve different document hits.
Basic Search results are an adjustable list of documents that can be manipulated further. The length of the list can be adjusted, sorting is possible by “Relevance” or “Date”. The list could be limited where search terms or concepts are found in the "Whole document", "Abstract", or for the Patents it could be limited to occurrences in “Claims”. The required document date can also be set via the "Release date” Searching for release date with a date range or a start or end date could include the full date or years only. The release date corresponds to a respective date in the sources, e.g. the publication date for patents.

The hit lists generated by a search and their display options are dependent on the repository used. For example, when searching PubMed Central, the hit list can be used to find the original document (click on Original Document: PMC as shown above), it shows a document relevancy score related to the executed query. The higher the score the more relevant is the document. The “Find: similar documents” button allows you to search for conceptually similar documents – however, please be aware that this search may take quite a while as many millions of documents will be classified on-the-fly based on concepts found in the selected document. When no document with sufficient conceptual similarity is found, no hit list will be returned.
For the Patents repository, it also possible to restrict the search to specific parts of the document, e.g. searching the whole document, or searching in the abstract or in the claims only, allowing to narrow down search results:

Our basic search allows searching for compounds either via their synonyms or chemical names, alternatively via their chemical classes (e.g. "steroids"). This will retrieve all such compounds or chemistry mentions in text documents. For patents, we also extract compounds and their structures from their images.
The specific structure based chemistry search ("Compound Search") option allows you to draw the chemical structure of a compound using a chemistry structure editor. After drawing, you may want decide if you like to perform a chemical "Full" (including isotopes and isomers), "Similarity", "Substructure", or "Duplicate" (exact match of all atomar properties) chemistry search:
Alternatively, you may open a file with a chemical structure, e.g. as a SDF or SMILES file, in a folder on your local computer and import the structure(s) into the editor.
When done with editing the compound, you may SEARCH this compound in our compound database, returning a table of matching compound hits, together with their structures, names, and IDs. The "Select And Export" selection field enables you to define compounds for export. When you "EXPORT" you will receive a file named "compound_export.csv" into your download folder, containing the compounds information for use in other chemistry programs.
Please be aware that the number of hit molecules for any chemistry query is currently limited to 100 results.
Hitting the "Compound details" link in the structure search result table returns information on the respective compound such as parent classes, synonyms and links to other databases. By hitting the "Search in documents" link a search on this specific compound is performed in the document collections, see "How to search chemical structures in documents?". When this search is performed, the result is shown in the basic search document hit list view while the search field contains the 12-digit unique structural identifier (OCID) of this compound. The different names of the compound (here 2-methylnaphthalene) are shown in bold in the document snippets: 
The search for compounds may be performed in two ways: using “Basic search” or using “Compound search”. In “Basic search” our cognitive search engine will detect when you enter a chemistry term and proposes it as a search term. For example, when entering “aspirin” the engine knows that it is either a chemistry compound term or a drug term, when used as a drug ingredient. The search for either one of the two concepts will return different results, as these concepts may have different synonyms and meaning – these will be displayed for your information below the search field.
However, you may also search for chemical terms that describe chemical classes, e.g. like “steroids” instead of a specific chemical compound. This search is especially powerful as our cognitive search engine knows what steroids are and uses all compounds that are classified as steroids for searching, e.g. estradiol or testosterone.
When searching for chemical compounds using “Compound search” our constantly growing chemistry database returns a list of compounds with some information such as synonyms and chemical structure. Subsequently, documents that contain these structures could be retrieved by the "Search in documents" option in the resulting compound hit list, providing an alternative way of discovering documents that contain a specific chemical structure.
The “Search for Co-occurrences” search strategy allows searching for sentences that contain two concepts of interest within one sentence. For example, when you are interested what kind enzyme proteins/genes are connected to the disease cancer you simply need to put “enzyme” and “cancer” into the two search fields Concept 1 and Concept 2, select a repository such as “Patents” and SEARCH:

As a search result, you will get a graphical representation of the connected, co-referenced enzymes as well as cancer types, also showing the most frequent co-occurrences by the size of the bullet. The total number of sub-bullets per query concept is however limited to a maximum of the 20 most frequent concepts found. Thus, we may get the co-occurrences for the up to 20 most frequent sub-concepts of query concept 1 together with the up to 20 most frequent sub-concepts of query concept 2:

If you are interested in the sentences that have produced these co-occurrences, please click the list beneath the graph and you will see those sentences (limiting the maximal number of retrieved sentences to 1000) as a list:

Clicking on a bullet of the 2D-graph, such as e.g. the “EGF receptor” bullet, will allow you to drill down into more specific relationships:

You may also want to explore and discover important relationships of any concept. For example, typing “Bcl6” into Concept 1, it is recognized as a protein term. Leaving Concept 2 empty and selecting a document repository such as “NIH Grants” performs a co-occurrence search of this protein and other concepts, co-occurring in one sentence of any NIH grant application. In the co-occurrences graph display you will see concept types that have been identified, e.g. “Disease”. By clicking on the Disease bullet link, you will re-focus on co-occurrences between “bcl6” and “Diseases”. This could be continued to drill down the hierarchy of concepts to a very specific co-occurrence. Alternatively, you may select any other hierarchy like Chemistry, Toxicology, Effect or process, Species, Substance, Polymer, Company Drug or Method.
Through the modern digital platform, opnMe, we give a unique opportunity for high-caliber talent to pitch their scientific ideas and approaches for a well-defined research question. By taking self-initiative to showcase expertise and skills, the winner will have the opportunity to execute their postdoctoral research plan in a state-of-the-art research environment at Boehringer Ingelheim. This position will initially cover a duration of 24 months with an option for extension by another 12 months.
For the duration of approximately 7 to 8 weeks, interested candidates are invited to submit their applications including a research plan addressing the question of our PostDoc grant project. Upon evaluation after the deadline, our scientific review team will select a small number of finalists who are invited to present their research proposals as part of scientific presentations at our research site or virtually. The finalists will also have the opportunity to meet the team and our partners from Human Resources for individual interviews. This is also the time they have the chance to address own questions and needs. The winner of the PostDoc grant will then be selected following the interviews.
You will have the opportunity to conduct your research at a leading R&D facility for up to three years to pursue and develop the creative research ideas proposed – fully funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.
Working in a high-profile laboratory environment including access to all relevant tools and technologies.
Mentoring support, access to a world of learning opportunities to follow science, innovate, and turn ideas into reality with impact to patients.
Opportunities to present work internally or at external scientific conferences and seminars, and ability to publish in leading journals.
Joining a vibrant and diverse scientific community and building foundations of professional networks that could last a lifetime.
Obtaining experience in working in a drug discovery environment positioned for further careers in pharma, biotechnology, and academia.
As part of our existing PostDoc program, you will benefit from multiple years of experience in successfully mentoring PostDocs and preparing them for their further development for either an academic or industry career.
In addition, you will be able to benefit from the productive exchange with PostDocs from other departments and be able to join extracurricular training sessions on drug discovery, non-clinical and clinical development, and subsequent phases to address patient centric needs for diseases that currently still lack treatment options.
All our PostDocs are entitled to receive a competitive salary and access to the full benefits programs offered.
Winners of the opn2TALENTS grant will receive competitive salary support and benefits, within the guidelines of the program. Resources to support your proposed project and some additional costs (e.g., relocation, immigration support, if needed), are provided by Boehringer Ingelheim.
Yes, we encourage and support turning innovation into high-quality publications.
Our opnMe call is structured in several phases. As part of the first phase, we invite for scientific project ideas as part of individual applications.
We strive to complete our review of all incoming research proposals, in alignment with the timeline outlined in the call.
Shortlisted candidates will then be invited for our opn2TALENTS interview week, which may be held on-site or virtually. We plan to give enough time for the finalists to prepare for their travel plans, but we still suggest that you block the time frame outlined in the specific call, in your calendars at the time of submitting your proposal. Please expect that you will be invited for only one day during this time frame. Depending on your location, please reserve more than one day for travel. The final winner will be informed soon after. The active research phase of the PostDoc could start as per discussion with the team and will also depend on personal needs of the winning grant recipient.
Demonstrating that the research question is understood and clearly outlining the innovation aspects of the answer.
A research project plan that covers a maximum of 3 years, it should include a description of work packages, milestones, expected deliveries, and contingency plans. If applicable, clearly indicate any work that will not be done at Boehringer Ingelheim site please specify where, when and duration period.
Demonstration of relevant technical skills and disease experience to successfully address our scientific question based on the CV, publication list, and letters of recommendations.
Applying for the opn2TALENTS call would not affect any rights to your original idea (‘background IP’).
If confidential data exists that would strengthen the proposal, please indicate that information is available to share under a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (CDA). If we find the non-confidential concept proposal sufficiently interesting, we will execute a CDA for confidential discussions.
The review of submitted scientific proposals will start after the final application date. We strive to finalize our internal evaluation within four weeks after this date and plan to invite the winning finalists shortly afterwards. The final winner will be informed soon after, in alignment with the timeframe outlined in the call.
No. All submissions will only be shared inside Boehringer Ingelheim amongst a team of scientists designated to evaluate all applications. They will not be visible to, or shared with, scientists from other institutions.
Successful grant recipients will conduct their research at one of the three R&D facilities of Boehringer Ingelheim for up to three years, fully funded by Boehringer Ingelheim. There is the possibility to carry out parts of the planned experiments at the current home institution. The specific location will depend on where the project team is based out of: Biberach (Germany), Vienna (Austria) or Ridgefield (US).
Please find more information about Biberach here.
Boehringer Ingelheim has a PostDoc program in place and since then, has successfully supported over 100 PostDoc candidates at its Discovery Research sites in Austria, Germany, and the US. In 2023, we have complemented this program with the opn2TALENTS initiative which allows more talents to interact with Boehringer Ingelheim.
Please register for our opn2TALENTS PostDoc grant newsletter to be among the first to learn more about new opportunities.